By Swastika Adhikary
![]() |
Illustration by Arunima Pahari, B.Sc. Graphics and Animation, 2nd year, Adamas University |
Kerala Education Minister V Sivankutty has termed the decision “irrational,” citing potential violations of federal principles and Constitutional values. He believes that textbook titles shape children’s perception and imagination, and English-medium students deserve English titles. Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president K Selvaperunthagai has demanded that the NCERT withdraw the Hindi titles, calling it an attempt to impose Hindi on non-Hindi states.
NCERT officials argue that names like “Poorvi,” “Mridang,” and “Santoor” carry deep cultural associations, promoting national unity and Indian knowledge systems. These titles reflect India’s diversity and unity, fostering a joyful and culturally contextualized learning experience for all students. Some experts see the move as a potential imposition of Hindi on non-Hindi speaking students, undermining federal principles and constitutional values.
NCERT defends the titles, stating that they represent a “language of joy” and are derived from India’s rich musical heritage, transcending linguistic barriers.
The NCERT’s decision has sparked a nationwide discussion about language, culture, and education. As the debate unfolds, it’s essential to consider the implications for students, teachers, and the education system. The outcome of this discussion will likely shape the future of education in India, influencing how language and culture are integrated into the curriculum. By engaging in open and informed dialogue, stakeholders can work together to create an education system that promotes national unity, respects regional diversity, and supports the diverse needs of students across the country.
Post a Comment